53 lines
2.0 KiB
Rust
53 lines
2.0 KiB
Rust
//! B011 const guard 回归测试:const 声明路径不依赖寄存器槽新鲜度。
|
||
//!
|
||
//! 背景:`dispatch_store_var` 的 const guard(b!=0)读 `regs[rd]` 判断目标槽是否已初始化。
|
||
//! 声明路径带 b=1 时,checkpoint/寄存器复用残留陈旧值会误抛 "Assignment to constant variable"。
|
||
//! Phase 5 RegAlloc 复用寄存器后此 bug 必现——本测试锁死声明路径恒 b=0 的行为。
|
||
|
||
use oxide_compiler::compiler::Compiler;
|
||
use oxide_parser::Allocator;
|
||
use oxide_vm::vm::Vm;
|
||
|
||
fn eval(source: &str) -> String {
|
||
let allocator = Allocator::default();
|
||
let program = match oxide_parser::parse(&allocator, source) {
|
||
Ok(p) => p,
|
||
Err(e) => return format!("parse error: {}", e[0].message),
|
||
};
|
||
let module = match Compiler::new().compile(&program) {
|
||
Ok(m) => m,
|
||
Err(e) => return format!("compile error: {e}"),
|
||
};
|
||
let mut vm = Vm::new();
|
||
match vm.run(&module) {
|
||
Ok(result) => format!("{result}"),
|
||
Err(e) => format!("vm error: {e}"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// B011 复现样例:switch 语句(checkpoint 复用槽)后跟 const 声明。
|
||
// 修复前误抛 "Assignment to constant variable",修复后输出 5。
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn switch_then_const_declaration_no_false_positive() {
|
||
assert_eq!(eval("switch (1) { case 1: break; } const x = 5; x"), "5");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// 锚:对已声明 const 再赋值仍必须抛错(guard 保留在赋值路径)。
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn const_reassignment_still_throws() {
|
||
let out = eval("const x = 5; x = 6");
|
||
assert!(out.contains("Assignment to constant variable"), "got: {out}");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// 锚:块级 const 遮蔽互不影响(内层 const 不污染外层槽)。
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn block_scoped_const_shadowing_independent() {
|
||
assert_eq!(eval("const x = 5; { const x = 1; } x"), "5");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// 锚:解构 const 声明正常(emit_object_binding → emit_bind_target)。
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn const_destructuring_declaration_works() {
|
||
assert_eq!(eval("const { a } = { a: 7 }; a"), "7");
|
||
}
|